Pentium D 925 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
300f10
Core
Presler
Llano
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
October 2006
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
3.98k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
4k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
2.05k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
1.37k (x1.71)
TOTAL
7.7k
11.4k (x1.48)
Multithread
925
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
5.74k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
6.05k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
2.85k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
1.86k (x2.3)
TOTAL
14.03k
16.5k (x1.18)
Performance/W
925
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4