Pentium D 820 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The 820 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 820 gets a score of 14.1 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the 820. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 820 gets a score of 14.1 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3310MX is 1.2 times faster than the 820. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f44
300f10
Core
Smithfield
Llano
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
May 2005
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
7.45k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.07k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
820
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1.93k
3.98k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
3.11k
4k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.49k
2.05k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.37k (x1.51)
TOTAL
7.45k
11.4k (x1.53)
Multithread
820
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
3.92k
5.74k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
6.23k
6.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.99k
2.85k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.94k
1.86k (x1.99)
TOTAL
14.07k
16.5k (x1.17)
Performance/W
820
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
30 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
48 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
7 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
108 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
820
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
690 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1112 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
534 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
324 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
2660 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4