Pentium P6200 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.6 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.6 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
f4a
Core
Arrandale
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
35 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
- kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
- kB
Date
September 2010
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
3.87k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
8.17k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.67k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.82k (x1.01)
TOTAL
12.74k
16.53k (x1.3)
Multithread
P6200
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
3.46k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
22.59k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
8.09k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.85k (x1.32)
TOTAL
22.91k
37k (x1.62)
Performance/W
P6200
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4