Pentium P6200 vs E5200 (M0)
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
10676
Core
Arrandale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
2.88k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
6.31k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.53k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.35k (x0.75)
TOTAL
12.74k
13.08k (x1.03)
Multithread
P6200
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
5.45k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
11.5k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
4.02k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.05k (x0.49)
TOTAL
22.91k
22.02k (x0.96)
Performance/W
P6200
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4