Pentium P6200 vs Pentium D 925
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the 925 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.6 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 925 gets 14 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.6 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
f65
Core
Arrandale
Presler
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
October 2006
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
7.7k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
14.03k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
925
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
2.06k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
3.32k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
1.52k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
0.8k (x0.44)
TOTAL
12.74k
7.7k (x0.6)
Multithread
P6200
925
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
4k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
6.32k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
2.91k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
0.81k (x0.37)
TOTAL
22.91k
14.03k (x0.61)
Performance/W
P6200
925
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
42 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
67 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
31 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
148 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
925
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
686 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
507 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
266 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
2565 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4