Pentium P6200 vs Core 2 Duo P8400
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the P8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.1 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.1 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
10676
Core
Arrandale
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.267 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
11.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
21.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
2.43k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
5.4k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.13k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.43k (x0.79)
TOTAL
12.74k
11.38k (x0.89)
Multithread
P6200
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
4.81k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
10.58k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
4.18k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.45k (x0.67)
TOTAL
22.91k
21.02k (x0.92)
Performance/W
P6200
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
423 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
841 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
629 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
5022 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4