Pentium P6200 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.1 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8200 is 1.1 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
10676
Core
Arrandale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
3k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
6.62k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.55k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
3.6k (x2)
TOTAL
12.74k
15.77k (x1.24)
Multithread
P6200
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
5.83k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
12.64k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
4.97k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.95k (x0.9)
TOTAL
22.91k
25.39k (x1.11)
Performance/W
P6200
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4