Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-720QM
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the i7-720QM is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i7-720QM gets 38.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
106e5
Core
Arrandale
Clarksfield
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2010
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
13.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
38.78k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
5.49k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
3.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.01k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
2.09k (x1.16)
TOTAL
12.74k
13.13k (x1.03)
Multithread
P6200
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
15.06k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
12.15k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
7.18k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
4.39k (x2.03)
TOTAL
22.91k
38.78k (x1.69)
Performance/W
P6200
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
335 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
270 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
160 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
862 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
i7-720QM
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1962 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
717 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
745 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4