Pentium P6200 vs Core i7-640LM
Description
Both models P6200 and i7-640LM are based on Westmere architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.4 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.4 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
20655
Core
Arrandale
Calpella
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2010
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
31.74k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
7.01k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
4.58k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.73k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
2.03k (x1.13)
TOTAL
12.74k
16.35k (x1.28)
Multithread
P6200
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
12.93k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
10.21k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
6.22k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.37k (x1.1)
TOTAL
22.91k
31.74k (x1.39)
Performance/W
P6200
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
517 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
1269 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
762 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
6130 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4