Pentium P6200 vs Core i5-450M
Description
Both models P6200 and i5-450M are based on Westmere architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i5-450M gets 29.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-450M is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i5-450M gets 29.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-450M is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
20655
Core
Arrandale
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2010
June 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
12.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
29.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
5.4k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
3.7k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.06k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.77k (x0.98)
TOTAL
12.74k
12.93k (x1.02)
Multithread
P6200
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
11.83k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
9.39k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
5.31k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.58k (x1.19)
TOTAL
22.91k
29.1k (x1.27)
Performance/W
P6200
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
338 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
152 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
831 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
i5-450M
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
2024 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
772 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
665 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
4850 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4