Pentium P6200 vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
306a9
Core
Arrandale
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2010
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
6.66k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
6.88k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.68k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
2.6k (x1.44)
TOTAL
12.74k
18.83k (x1.48)
Multithread
P6200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
16.56k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
11.7k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
7.28k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.91k
37.78k (x1.65)
Performance/W
P6200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4