Pentium P6200 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.4 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.4 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
30678
Core
Arrandale
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
4.8k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
2.47k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
1.86k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.22k (x0.68)
TOTAL
12.74k
10.36k (x0.81)
Multithread
P6200
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
8.24k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
4.19k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
3.05k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.32k (x0.61)
TOTAL
22.91k
16.79k (x0.73)
Performance/W
P6200
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4