Pentium P6200 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.8 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.8 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
6f2
Core
Arrandale
Allendale
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
June 2007
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
7k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
12.87k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
2.08k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
1.88k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
1.89k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.16k (x0.64)
TOTAL
12.74k
7k (x0.55)
Multithread
P6200
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
4.16k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
3.74k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
3.78k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.19k (x0.55)
TOTAL
22.91k
12.87k (x0.56)
Performance/W
P6200
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
198 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4