Pentium P6200 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.5 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 3.5 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
100fa0
Core
Arrandale
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
5.17k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
5.33k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
2.76k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
3.51k (x1.95)
TOTAL
12.74k
16.77k (x1.32)
Multithread
P6200
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
29.82k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
30.79k (x4.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
15.88k (x4.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
3.69k (x1.71)
TOTAL
22.91k
80.19k (x3.5)
Performance/W
P6200
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4