Pentium P6200 vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.2 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.2 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
100f63
Core
Arrandale
Regor
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
September 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
6.04k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
6.2k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
3.11k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
1.7k (x0.94)
TOTAL
12.74k
17.05k (x1.34)
Multithread
P6200
260
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
10.02k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
10.18k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
5.1k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
2.25k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.91k
27.54k (x1.2)
Performance/W
P6200
260
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
260
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4