Pentium P6200 vs A9 9420
Description
The P6200 is based on Westmere architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P6200 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the 9420 gets 28.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.3 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
670f00
Core
Arrandale
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.133 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
12.74k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
22.91k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P6200
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
5.29k
8.41k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
11.48k (x3.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.1k
3.29k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.8k
2.24k (x1.24)
TOTAL
12.74k
25.41k (x1.99)
Multithread
P6200
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
10.06k
11.25k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
6.74k
13.69k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.96k
2.09k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.16k
1.87k (x0.86)
TOTAL
22.91k
28.89k (x1.26)
Performance/W
P6200
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
287 points/W
750 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
193 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113 points/W
139 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
62 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
655 points/W
1926 points/W
Performance/GHz
P6200
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2478 points/GHz
2336 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/GHz
3188 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
845 points/GHz
621 points/GHz
TOTAL
5972 points/GHz
7058 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4