Pentium N3540 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Description
The N3540 is based on Silvermont architecture while the TK-42 is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 37.5 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N3540 is 2.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3540 gets a score of 37.5 k points while the TK-42 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N3540 is 2.9 times faster than the TK-42. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
60f82
Core
Bay Trail-M
Tyler
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket S1g1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
7,5 W
20 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
July 2014
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.72k points
6.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.5k points
12.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3540
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
4.97k
1.06k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
2.58k
2.91k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.98k
1.43k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
0.89k (x0.74)
TOTAL
10.72k
6.28k (x0.59)
Multithread
N3540
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
18.92k
4.02k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.67k
5.2k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.37k
2.68k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.54k
1k (x0.65)
TOTAL
37.5k
12.91k (x0.34)
Performance/W
N3540
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
2703 points/W
201 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1382 points/W
260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
220 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
5357 points/W
645 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3540
TK-42
Test#1 (Integers)
1864 points/GHz
662 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
967 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
741 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/GHz
555 points/GHz
TOTAL
4020 points/GHz
3927 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4