Pentium G645 vs E5200 (M0)
Description
The G645 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the G645 is 1.6 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the G645 is 1.6 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2012
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
22.24k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.38k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G645
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
2.88k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
6.31k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
2.53k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
1.35k (x0.42)
TOTAL
22.24k
13.08k (x0.59)
Multithread
G645
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
14.06k
5.45k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
11.5k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.83k
4.02k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
1.05k (x0.28)
TOTAL
35.38k
22.02k (x0.62)
Performance/W
G645
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
182 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
90 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
544 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
G645
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2987 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1199 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1103 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
7669 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4