Pentium G645 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The G645 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.3 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G645 gets a score of 35.4 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.3 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
100fa0
Core
Sandy Bridge
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2012
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
22.24k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.38k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G645
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
5.17k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
6.9k
5.33k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
2.76k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.2k
3.51k (x1.1)
TOTAL
22.24k
16.77k (x0.75)
Multithread
G645
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.06k
29.82k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
30.79k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.83k
15.88k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.69k (x1)
TOTAL
35.38k
80.19k (x2.27)
Performance/W
G645
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
182 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
90 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
544 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
G645
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2987 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2380 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1199 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1103 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
7669 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4