| | | | | | |

Pentium G4560 vs Xeon E5-4640


Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-4640 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the E5-4640 gets 581.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-4640 is 6.5 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
206d7
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
8 /16
TDP
54 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2012
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
13.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
610.16k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
6.19k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
5.89k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
2.11k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
2.51k (x0.34)
TOTAL
44.21k
16.7k (x0.38)

Multithread

G4560

E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
244.88k (x9)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
215.35k (x4.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
114.64k (x9.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
6.76k (x0.94)
TOTAL
89.91k
581.63k (x6.47)

Performance/W
G4560
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
2267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
1207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
6122 points/W

Performance/GHz
G4560
E5-4640
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
2210 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
2105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
5966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4