Pentium G4560 vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The G4560 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 173.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.9 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G4560 gets a score of 89.9 k points while the i3-10100T gets 173.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.9 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
44.21k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
89.91k points
227.67k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G4560
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.01k
13.84k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.74k
19.79k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.28k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.4k
8.31k (x1.12)
TOTAL
44.21k
47.22k (x1.07)
Multithread
G4560
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
27.22k
54.67k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
43.79k
90.71k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.74k
24.11k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.16k
3.85k (x0.54)
TOTAL
89.91k
173.34k (x1.93)
Performance/W
G4560
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
504 points/W
841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
811 points/W
1396 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
217 points/W
371 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
133 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
1665 points/W
2667 points/W
Performance/GHz
G4560
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3718 points/GHz
3218 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
4602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1228 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2114 points/GHz
1934 points/GHz
TOTAL
12632 points/GHz
10982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4