Pentium G3260 vs 4415U
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
56.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
8.29k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
11.82k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.09k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.18k (x1.09)
TOTAL
30.56k
27.39k (x0.9)
Multithread
G3260
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
17.24k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
27.4k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
7.44k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.31k (x0.66)
TOTAL
58.89k
56.39k (x0.96)
Performance/W
G3260
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
3759 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4