Pentium G3260 vs Core i5-10400T
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.9 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.9 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
53 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
307.18k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
12.61k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
17.94k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.83k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
10.81k (x2.82)
TOTAL
30.56k
46.19k (x1.51)
Multithread
G3260
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
74.62k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
119.63k (x5.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
32.65k (x3.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.52k (x0.38)
TOTAL
58.89k
229.42k (x3.9)
Performance/W
G3260
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4