Pentium G3260 vs Core i3-9100T
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-9100T gets 145.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i3-9100T gets 145.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906eb
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
53 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
192.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
13.74k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
19.7k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.86k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8.61k (x2.25)
TOTAL
30.56k
46.91k (x1.53)
Multithread
G3260
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
50.5k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
72.58k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
18.09k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
4.28k (x0.65)
TOTAL
58.89k
145.45k (x2.47)
Performance/W
G3260
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
2074 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
517 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
4156 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3713 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
2327 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
12678 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4