Pentium G3260 vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.4 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
100fa0
Core
Haswell
Thuban
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
53 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
5.17k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
5.33k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.76k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.51k (x0.92)
TOTAL
30.56k
16.77k (x0.55)
Multithread
G3260
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
29.82k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
30.79k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
15.88k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
3.69k (x0.56)
TOTAL
58.89k
80.19k (x1.36)
Performance/W
G3260
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4