Pentium G3260 vs A6 9210
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 2.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 2.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
670f00
Core
Haswell
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
53 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
4.87k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
10.38k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.59k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.38k (x0.62)
TOTAL
30.56k
20.22k (x0.66)
Multithread
G3260
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
7.41k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
11.87k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
3.35k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
2.6k (x0.4)
TOTAL
58.89k
25.23k (x0.43)
Performance/W
G3260
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4