Pentium G3260 vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The G3260 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.3 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3260 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 194.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 3.3 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906a3
Core
Haswell
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
2/2
12/16
TDP
53 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
30.56k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
58.89k points
225.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3260
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
21.93k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
10.45k
18.79k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
10.5k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8.11k (x2.12)
TOTAL
30.56k
59.33k (x1.94)
Multithread
G3260
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.99k
61.07k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
20.53k
86.08k (x4.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
41.08k (x4.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.55k
6.02k (x0.92)
TOTAL
58.89k
194.25k (x3.3)
Performance/W
G3260
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
1357 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
387 points/W
1913 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
166 points/W
913 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
124 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
1111 points/W
4317 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3260
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
4873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3165 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
2334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1161 points/GHz
1802 points/GHz
TOTAL
9261 points/GHz
13184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4