Pentium G2020 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 5 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 5 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
50654
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
55 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2013
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
281.48k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G2020
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2.94k
3k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
8.23k
12.29k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
3.64k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
6.55k (x2.66)
TOTAL
17.33k
25.46k (x1.47)
Multithread
G2020
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5.54k
20.42k (x3.69)
Test#2 (FP)
15.47k
95.83k (x6.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.06k
30.88k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
9.7k (x3.25)
TOTAL
31.05k
156.83k (x5.05)
Performance/W
G2020
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
101 points/W
240 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
281 points/W
1127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
363 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
565 points/W
1845 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1015 points/GHz
998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2839 points/GHz
4095 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
2182 points/GHz
TOTAL
5976 points/GHz
8487 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4