Pentium G2020 vs Xeon X5670
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2.7 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 42.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 2.7 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206c2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2013
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G2020
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
9.9k
8.35k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.01k
5.58k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.32k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
3k (x0.97)
TOTAL
25.87k
20.26k (x0.78)
Multithread
G2020
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
18.83k
49.72k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
14.15k
35.19k (x2.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.61k
21.88k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
8.6k (x3.06)
TOTAL
42.39k
115.4k (x2.72)
Performance/W
G2020
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
342 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
257 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
771 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3415 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3107 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1065 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
8921 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4