Pentium G2020 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G2020 gets a score of 31.1 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 3.3 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
50657
Core
Ivy Bridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
55 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2013
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
25.87k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
42.39k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G2020
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2.94k
1.97k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
8.23k
8.15k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.69k
2.37k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
4.84k (x1.97)
TOTAL
17.33k
17.32k (x1)
Multithread
G2020
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5.54k
15.73k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
15.47k
64.78k (x4.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.06k
18.06k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.99k
5.21k (x1.74)
TOTAL
31.05k
103.77k (x3.34)
Performance/W
G2020
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
101 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
281 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
54 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
565 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
G2020
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1015 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2839 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
849 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5976 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4