Pentium Gold 5405U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 325.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 6.7 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
306f2
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
452.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
11.08k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.57k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.18k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
3.28k (x1.3)
TOTAL
21.34k
27.11k (x1.27)
Multithread
5405U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
139.07k (x8.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
133.47k (x5.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
46.6k (x8.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
6.65k (x2.14)
TOTAL
48.83k
325.78k (x6.67)
Performance/W
5405U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
1159 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
1112 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
2715 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3573 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1027 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1059 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
8745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4