| | | | | | |

Pentium Gold 5405U vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.8 times faster than the 5405U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
706e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
142.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
7.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
10.55k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
5.27k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
5.66k (x2.25)
TOTAL
21.34k
28.56k (x1.34)

Multithread

5405U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
25.28k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
37.48k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
17.77k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
6.92k (x2.23)
TOTAL
48.83k
87.45k (x1.79)

Performance/W
5405U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
5405U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4