Pentium Gold 5405U vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
306a9
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
7.87k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
7.14k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.04k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.79k (x1.11)
TOTAL
21.34k
20.84k (x0.98)
Multithread
5405U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
15.12k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
14.05k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
5.94k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
3.48k (x1.12)
TOTAL
48.83k
38.59k (x0.79)
Performance/W
5405U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4