Pentium Gold 5405U vs Celeron 4205U
Description
Both models 5405U and 4205U are based on Whiskey Lake architecture.
Whiskey Lake is the third 14nm process-refinement and it’s a mobile architecture with a short list of U models.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Whiskey Lake is the third 14nm process-refinement and it’s a mobile architecture with a short list of U models.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.3 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
806ec
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
6.53k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.46k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.28k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.34k (x0.93)
TOTAL
21.34k
20.61k (x0.97)
Multithread
5405U
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
12.97k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
18.12k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
4.33k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
2.18k (x0.7)
TOTAL
48.83k
37.61k (x0.77)
Performance/W
5405U
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
5405U
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4