| | | | | | |

Pentium Gold 5405U vs A6 9210


Description
The 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5405U gets a score of 48.8 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
670f00
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.34k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.83k points
27.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
5405U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
4.87k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
10.38k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.59k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
2.38k (x0.95)
TOTAL
21.34k
20.22k (x0.95)

Multithread

5405U

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
7.41k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
11.87k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.59k
3.35k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.1k
2.6k (x0.84)
TOTAL
48.83k
25.23k (x0.52)

Performance/W
5405U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1069 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1607 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
372 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
207 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3255 points/W
1682 points/W

Performance/GHz
5405U
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
3046 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4134 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1004 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1094 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
9278 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4