Pentium 4417U vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The 4417U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4417U gets a score of 41.1 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.1 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2019
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.49k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
41.15k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4417U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.94k
7.87k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.35k
7.14k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.39k
3.04k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
2.79k (x1)
TOTAL
24.49k
20.84k (x0.85)
Multithread
4417U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.1k
15.12k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
21.1k
14.05k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.49k
5.94k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.46k
3.48k (x1.41)
TOTAL
41.15k
38.59k (x0.94)
Performance/W
4417U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1407 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
2743 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
4417U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3452 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4937 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1041 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1217 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
10646 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4