| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 76.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
3.45k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
9.96k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
4.26k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
4.27k (x1.65)
TOTAL
17.49k
21.94k (x1.25)

Multithread

4415U

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
14.01k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
37.68k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
17.05k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
7.35k (x3.02)
TOTAL
36.22k
76.09k (x2.1)

Performance/W
4415U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
471 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
2845 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
6268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4