| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Core 2 Duo E7200


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 2.2 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
10676
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
25.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.33k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
5.96k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
2.5k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
1.45k (x0.56)
TOTAL
17.49k
12.23k (x0.7)

Multithread

4415U

E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
4.65k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
11.87k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
5.01k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.23k (x0.51)
TOTAL
36.22k
22.76k (x0.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
2.93k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
6.48k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
2.6k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
1.45k (x0.35)
TOTAL
27.39k
13.46k (x0.49)

Multithread

4415U

E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
5.85k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
12.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
5.22k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
1.23k (x0.29)
TOTAL
56.39k
25.21k (x0.45)

Performance/W
4415U
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
388 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4