| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Core i5-3210M


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the i5-3210M gets 53.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
51.73k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
3.08k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
8.58k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.76k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.99k (x1.54)
TOTAL
17.49k
19.42k (x1.11)

Multithread

4415U

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
5.79k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
18.77k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
8.74k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
4.59k (x1.88)
TOTAL
36.22k
37.89k (x1.05)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
8.59k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
8.88k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
3.59k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
3.45k (x0.83)
TOTAL
27.39k
24.51k (x0.9)

Multithread

4415U

i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
20.18k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
19.96k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
8.93k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
4.6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
56.39k
53.67k (x0.95)

Performance/W
4415U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
577 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
255 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
1533 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
2864 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
1114 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
7908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4