Pentium 4415U vs Core i5-2520M
Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2520M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 36.2 k points while the i5-2520M gets 34.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-2520M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
24.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
50.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
2.69k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
7.28k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.84k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
3.05k (x1.18)
TOTAL
17.49k
16.86k (x0.96)
Multithread
4415U
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
6.08k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
16.15k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
8.87k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
3.06k (x1.26)
TOTAL
36.22k
34.15k (x0.94)
Performance/W
4415U
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
314 points/W
174 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1449 points/W
461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
490 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
162 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
2415 points/W
976 points/W
Performance/GHz
4415U
i5-2520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1017 points/GHz
840 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4136 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1326 points/GHz
1200 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1124 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
7603 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4