| | | | | | |

Pentium 4415U vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The 4415U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4415U gets a score of 56.4 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
27.39k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
56.39k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
4415U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
4k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
9.51k
14.19k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
4.62k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
11.03k (x4.27)
TOTAL
17.49k
33.84k (x1.94)

Multithread

4415U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
22.77k (x4.83)
Test#2 (FP)
21.73k
96.59k (x4.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.35k
31.65k (x4.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.45k (x1.01)
TOTAL
36.22k
153.46k (x4.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4415U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
12.61k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
17.94k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
4.83k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.18k
10.81k (x2.58)
TOTAL
27.39k
46.19k (x1.69)

Multithread

4415U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.24k
74.62k (x4.33)
Test#2 (FP)
27.4k
119.63k (x4.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.44k
32.65k (x4.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
2.52k (x0.58)
TOTAL
56.39k
229.42k (x4.07)

Performance/W
4415U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1149 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1827 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
496 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
287 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
3759 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
4415U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3605 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5140 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1344 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1819 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
11908 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4