Pentium 4 HT 531 vs Celeron N4020
Description
The 531 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 531 gets a score of 8.9 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 2.8 times faster than the 531. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 531 gets a score of 8.9 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 2.8 times faster than the 531. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f41
706a8
Core
Prescott
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
2004
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
7.95k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.95k points
25.26k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1.56k
1.25k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
2.78k
5.19k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.35k
2.56k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.61k (x1.77)
TOTAL
6.6k
10.61k (x1.61)
Multithread
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1.29k
1.68k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
3.26k
7.29k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.6k
3.51k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.29k (x1.44)
TOTAL
7.05k
13.78k (x1.95)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.1k
5.14k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
3.33k
7.89k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.6k
2.87k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.76k (x1.93)
TOTAL
7.95k
17.67k (x2.22)
Multithread
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1.89k
7.46k (x3.94)
Test#2 (FP)
4.23k
11.61k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.93k
4.27k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.89k
1.91k (x2.14)
TOTAL
8.95k
25.26k (x2.82)
Performance/W
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
23 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
50 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
106 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
531
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
701 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1111 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
534 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
2650 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4