| | | |

Pentium 4 HT 515J vs Xeon E5502


Description
The 515J is based on NetBurst architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 515J gets a score of 0 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.

Summarizing, the E5502 is INF times faster than the 515J. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f41
106a5
Core
Prescott
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
1/2
2 /2
TDP
84 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
2004
March 2009

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
515J
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2045
4758 (132.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
3253
3146 (-3.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1564
1939 (23.94%)
Test#1 (Memory)
760
1454 (91.41%)
TOTAL
7622
11297 (48.21%)

Multithread

515J

E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
0
9478 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
6298 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3861 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
2642 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
22279 (inf%)

Performance/W
515J
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
278 points/W

Performance/GHz
515J
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
697 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
533 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
259 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
2599 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9