| | | |

Pentium 4 HT 515J vs Celeron N3450


Description
The 515J is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 515J gets a score of 0 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is INF times faster than the 515J. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f41
506c9
Core
Prescott
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.933 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
1/2
4/4
TDP
84 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
2004
August 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
515J
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1522
1542 (1.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
2714
2856 (5.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321
1875 (41.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
759
1784 (134.95%)
TOTAL
6316
8057 (27.56%)

Multithread

515J

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
0
5908 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
8546 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
5483 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
2982 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
22919 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
515J
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
2045
5953 (191.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
3253
3454 (6.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1564
1922 (22.86%)
Test#1 (Memory)
760
1781 (134.51%)
TOTAL
7622
13110 (72.00%)

Multithread

515J

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
0
21382 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
9838 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
5250 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
2862 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
39332 (inf%)

Performance/W
515J
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
515J
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
697 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
533 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
259 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
2599 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9