Pentium 4 HT 521 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Description
The 521 is based on NetBurst architecture while the SU7300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 521 gets a score of 8.4 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.3 times faster than the 521. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 521 gets a score of 8.4 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the SU7300 is 1.3 times faster than the 521. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f49
1067a
Core
Prescott
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
1/2
2/2
TDP
84 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
2004
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
7.48k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
8.42k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
521
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
1.48k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
3.12k
3.27k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.49k
1.24k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
0.93k (x1.02)
TOTAL
7.48k
6.92k (x0.93)
Multithread
521
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.77k
2.54k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
3.96k
5.49k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.8k
2.1k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.13k (x1.26)
TOTAL
8.42k
11.27k (x1.34)
Performance/W
521
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
21 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
47 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
11 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
100 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
521
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
701 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1113 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
533 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
325 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
2672 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4