N100 vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 4.3 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
906ed
Core
Alder Lake-N
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
27.81k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
25.88k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
5.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
14.19k (x2.85)
TOTAL
36.79k
73.53k (x2)
Multithread
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
175.69k (x4.74)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
166.56k (x5.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
35.04k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
4.23k (x1.09)
TOTAL
88.29k
381.53k (x4.32)
Performance/W
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4