N100 vs Core i7-10610U
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-N
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
162k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
23.1k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
20k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.61k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
8.94k (x1.8)
TOTAL
36.79k
56.65k (x1.54)
Multithread
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
73.36k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
68.28k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
13.73k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
6.62k (x1.7)
TOTAL
88.29k
162k (x1.83)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
6480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4