N100 vs Core i5-7300HQ
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
906e9
Core
Alder Lake-N
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
168.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
21.65k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
19.18k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
4.38k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
8.3k (x1.67)
TOTAL
36.79k
53.51k (x1.45)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
77.12k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
68.68k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
15.24k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
7.78k (x2)
TOTAL
88.29k
168.81k (x1.91)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
3751 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4