N100 vs Core i5-10400
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 4.2 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-N
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
27.46k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
24.28k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
5.65k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
11.92k (x2.4)
TOTAL
36.79k
69.31k (x1.88)
Multithread
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
165.5k (x4.46)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
156.32k (x4.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
39.88k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
5.96k (x1.53)
TOTAL
88.29k
367.65k (x4.16)
Performance/W
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4