N100 vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the gets a score of 88.3 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
b06e0
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-N
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1264
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.79k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.29k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.23k
26.37k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
23.91k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.54k
5.57k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.98k
11.68k (x2.35)
TOTAL
36.79k
67.53k (x1.84)
Multithread
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
114.08k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
32.57k
114.71k (x3.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.75k
27.33k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
4.25k (x1.09)
TOTAL
88.29k
260.38k (x2.95)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6178 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2459 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
649 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
14715 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
4479 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3247 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1631 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1464 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
10821 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4